Is 2300 Blitz Elo Good. Why blitz elo are much much harder to get than rapid?(i play 5+5 min blitz and 10 min rapid with 1200 is a good chess rating because it's far higher than beginners, but still attainable for casual players Elo rating systems do a pretty good job for the most part, but there are some potential issues that Professor Mark Glickman in particular has attempted to address with his rating systems.
2300 ELO with 275 matches YouTube from www.youtube.com
Typically a chess master is rated 2200 and will be approximately 2300 chess.com blitz 1200 is a good chess rating because it's far higher than beginners, but still attainable for casual players
2300 ELO with 275 matches YouTube
1200 is a good chess rating because it's far higher than beginners, but still attainable for casual players Well, he's better than 98.2% of blitz players, 99.5% of rapid players, and 99.3% of classical players, so I'd say it's pretty good. I just hit 2300 lichess blitz about a month ago and hover just below.
Finally hit 1000 elo in blitz. r/chessbeginners. Honestly if you are below 2500 elo you should go to chessbeginners /s 1200 is a good chess rating because it's far higher than beginners, but still attainable for casual players
WoT Blitz T49 2300+ DMG YouTube. Elo rating systems do a pretty good job for the most part, but there are some potential issues that Professor Mark Glickman in particular has attempted to address with his rating systems. > > I mean, its not a bad rating, but you are over glorifying it